CASE LAW AIR 1964 KER 277 - AN OVERVIEW

case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview

case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview

Blog Article

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents on the boy or Woman usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they can cut off social relations with the son or even the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.

Sign up for E-mail Notification of new opinions The cases listed beneath have had opinions filed for them within the last 14 times. The following information is obtainable for Every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, which includes signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

For that foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more

Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court may be the highest court inside the United States. Decrease courts on the federal level contain the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related to the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each and every state has its have judicial system that features trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every state is often referred to as the “supreme” court, Despite the fact that there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or even the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, although state courts may additionally generally listen to cases involving federal laws.

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it can be handy for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to dispose of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has arrived at to your stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has attained these types of stage. Read more

The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report to your court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike check here setting.” The court approved her plan.

139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is a mandatory necessity in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law necessitates that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) If your organization is transprovincial.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender and also the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The different roles of case legislation in civil and common law traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there might be one or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason to the decision of the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted within an argument.

Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage just isn't detailed, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.

Report this page